WEF Harari interview and Schwab releases a paper.
“The common people should live in fear, they’re redundant “
PLEASE LIKE SUBSCRIBE and SHARE
For many years myself and others close to me on a WhatsApp group have known about the WEF and their goal to end most of humanity. No one believes us and they think we’re crazy ( we are victims of gaslighting ) but no one ever looks up the evidence we give them. If they had, maybe we wouldn’t be in this mess.
Everything I print is fact, I have the evidence or I don’t print it
If I was to print something and i didn’t know for a fact that I was right, I would be a genuine conspiracy theorist.
So i can assure you that everything I right can be checked and verified and is irrefutable.
Now these two nutters are the leaders of the WEF. But Harari is more of the mass genocidal type. He doesn’t have a care in the world about humanity. He wants to be a god. Here’s his bit, followed by Klaus Schwabs paper on vehicles. Remember these guys use helicopters, private planes and have 6 cars armed to the teeth to go and get bread
“Common people” are right to be fearful of a future in which they will be made “redundant“, according to World Economic Forum (WEF) advisor Yuval Noah Harari, who said “We just don’t need the vast majority of the population” in the early 21st century given modern technologies.”
Harari’s extraordinary remarks were made in an interview with Chris Anderson, the head of TED, published on Tuesday, and represent the strongest warning yet that Klaus Schwab’s WEF is intent on depopulating the world.
The WEF advisor assessed widespread anxiety among “common people” as being rooted in a fear of being “left behind” in a future run by “smart people.” Such fears are justified, according to Harari.
lot of people sense that they are being left behind and left out of the story, even if their material conditions are still relatively good. In the 20th century, what was common to all the stories — the liberal, the fascist, the communist — is that the big heroes of the story were the common people, not necessarily all people, but if you lived, say, in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, life was very grim, but when you looked at the propaganda posters on the walls that depicted the glorious future, you were there. You looked at the posters which showed steel workers and farmers in heroic poses, and it was obvious that this is the future.
Now, when people look at the posters on the walls, or listen to TED talks, they hear a lot of these these big ideas and big words about machine learning and genetic engineering and blockchain and globalization, and they are not there. They are no longer part of the story of the future, and I think that — again, this is a hypothesis — if I try to understand and to connect to the deep resentment of people, in many places around the world, part of what might be going there is people realize — and they’re correct in thinking that — that, ‘The future doesn’t need me. You have all these smart people in California and in New York and in Beijing, and they are planning this amazing future with artificial intelligence and bio-engineering and in global connectivity and whatnot, and they don’t need me. Maybe if they are nice, they will throw some crumbs my way like universal basic income,’ but it’s much worse psychologically to feel that you are useless than to feel that you are exploited.
Earlier this month Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum ordered compliant governments around the world to increase the already sky-high price of gas. Now the WEF is claiming people have no right to own cars and must instead “walk or share.”
In a paper published by the WEF on Friday, the globalist elites claim that communal sharing of cars is part of a “circular approach” necessary to reduce global demands for precious metals and fossil fuels. Thousands of private jets fly into Davos each year for the WEF’s summit, but according to Klaus Schwab ordinary people should not own their own car.
The global elites in Geneva, Switzerland, are now instructing their Young Global Leaders embedded in governments around the world that far too many people own private vehicles and this situation must be changed by pricing people out of the market.
Citing the fact that “the average car or van in England is driven just 4% of the time,” the WEF claims this means people in developed countries including the United States should not have the right to own their own car. People should sell their car and walk or share because “Car sharing platforms such as Getaround and BlueSG have already seized that opportunity to offer vehicles where you pay per hour used.”
The end of private ownership is essential, according to the WEF, and can be applied to everything from cars to private homes and even city-wide design principles.
“A design process that focuses on fulfilling the underlying need instead of designing for product purchasing is fundamental to this transition,” the WEF sets out. “This is the mindset needed to redesign cities to reduce private vehicles and other usages.”
Part of the “circular approach” appears to be driving already sky-high gas prices even higher.
In an article published earlier this month, the WEF issued a call to its legion of Young Global Leaders, stating the gas prices we are experiencing in 2022 are simply not high enough. As though ordinary people aren’t suffering enough pain at the gas pump, Klaus Schwab is claiming the current prices are severely “underpriced.”
The WEF article is complicated and disingenuous, but it basically calls for an end to any and all tax credits for oil, gas and coal production — along with higher taxes. This idea isn’t new. Basically it’s the same idea as pricing fossil fuels based upon their carbon content. The result would make gas an unaffordable luxury for the vast majority of the population.
Per WEF:
First, leading democracies should agree to end the underpricing of fossil fuels, which is the principal factor preventing a clean energy transition. The underpricing associated with producing and burning coal, oil and gas amounted to $5.9 trillion in economic costs in 2020. Nearly a quarter of these losses – $1.45 trillion – occurred in 48 major and smaller democracies.
The leading democracies of the G20 should collectively commit to phasing out cost and tax breaks for the production and consumption of fossil fuels. They should also phase in more efficient pricing of fossil fuels through taxes or tradable permits to cover the costs of local air pollution, global warming, and other economic damages.
World Economic Forum: “Transitioning to green energy is key to both tackling climate change and creating sustainable economies. Here’s why”
There are three more provisions you can read about at the WEF website, all of which would massively increase the price of fossil fuels across the board. The WEF justify this with this statement:
By delaying a clean energy transition, leading democracies are making their economies more vulnerable through continued reliance on fossil fuels. Collectively acting to foster a green transition is not only good for the climate but also critical for protecting democracy.
World Economic Forum: “Transitioning to green energy is key to both tackling climate change and creating sustainable economies. Here’s why”
The key point in Klaus Schwab’s latest proclamation is that that fossil fuels are presently “underpriced“. Of course, US consumers are presently paying the “market price” for these fuels. Apparently the “market price” is too low for the WEF.
This leads us to the big question. How long — weeks, days, months — before we see the Biden administration take regulatory action to comply with this WEF edict?
What are the odds on an Executive Order?
PLEASE LIKE SUBSCRIBE and SHARE
I do not want to lose my standard of living for something that IMHO is unproven speculation. Life is pretty good for many people in the early 21st century, as compared to almost any other time in recorded history. No, not for everyone, and no, people are not equal, and will never be, unless forced by totalitarianism to be so on the outside. But things are better than they were (except perhaps for the degradation of the health agencies over the covid and vaccine debacle, a different subject). If the debate is individuality vs collectivism, I stand more with the individual and the freedom to make decisions for ones self.
We all work together in society to improve our individual lives, and need the freedom to contribute what we can, and also to keep and enjoy the fruits of our own labor.
When that society turns on us, even for what appears to be the best of motives "for the greater good", then it may become self destructive and destructive of the individual. I do not like that, and we certainly have enough experience of that kind of thing from the communists and fascists' of the last century.
Re Harari: I have not yet red his piece, but the TED interview was interesting, and I recommend it. He is obviously a bright guy and deep thinker, and he meditates, looking at his inner self, both good things IMHO. He seems however to like top down solutions, and seems to like taxation as a solution. Neither of which I support other than at a bare minimum.